
Everyone is pissed off about the Paul Williams versus Erislandy Lara fight, and frankly I understand most of the argument that's being delivered by various boxing insiders. I still though can understand the judges final scoring.
For those who aren't aware, or have little interest in boxing, the final scores of the bout were 114-114, and 115-114, 116-114 for Williams. Although those score cards reflected a victory, it appeared that "The Punisher" was clearly defeated.
While I agree that Lara appeared to win the fight when I watched it the first time, I didn't feel the same (yes I'm crazy) when I watched it the second and third time. It was closer than I thought. I took time to score the fight the second and third time. I came out 115-113 for Williams and 114-114 even. What's clear is that Lara landed that same left hand on Williams throughout the bout, but what was hidden was who was more active. That was the fighter from South Carolina.
Now I completely understand what the judges should be observing, and that is clean & effective punching coupled with effective aggressiveness and a display of ring generalship. That is simply the guy who lands the sharper, harder punches and dictates the action. That's been policy for as long as I've been watching the fights. Nothing new there.
What we all know to be fact is that judges don't always look at the fights that way. We've heard rumblings that there are guys who like the more aggressive guy, the fighter who is coming forward and pressing the action. Other judges are looking for what the rules say and we still have those collecting checks under the table for favorable scorecards. That's boxing. That's how the game has been, and that didn't change when Williams and Lara dueled this past weekend.
Lara was sharp on the outside and used good lateral movement, landing the right jab and more noticeably the straight left hand round after round. The
punchstat #'s, which can be deceiving at times, indicate what we all saw, that being that Lara landed more shots (224) over the course of the fight, however Williams threw 1,047 punches, compared to just 530 for the Cuban fighter. Williams fought as he always does, like a small man on the inside, but what people failed to see, and this is where I can see the judges decision being correct, was that Paul punched in every clinch. He landed some uppercuts, did decent body work, and more than anything else let his hands go. Even though Lara landed his punches first in many exchanges, Williams was also throwing punches of his own. He didn't stop working although he was getting caught.
I don't deny that Erislandy Lara landed all the "big" punches in the fight, and in most cases deserved to be proclaimed the winner. I thought he was the better man, but I don't think it was the worst decision in the history of boxing. What's clear is that the judges didn't see it the same way that everyone else in the building and watching on television did, and that they favored the boxer who still was throwing a high volume of punches even in the later rounds.
Activity has been the calling card of Williams, and against Lara that's what won him the fight. It's almost absurd to think that a guy who's overall connect % was 19 would come out with a win, but nothing is surprising in boxing and every decision isn't the worst one ever.